Documentation essays

bni referral resume 9500 Fremont Ave N #203, Seattle, WA 98103. Documentation Essays. JOB OBJECTIVE : Art Director or design position with a forward-thinking custom sign company with a strong sense of joyful, creative design and excellence. Award-winning Sign Designer, with a proven track record of dissertion accomplishments, integral leadership, problem solving and essays team building skills, with accurate and consistent performance. February 2005 to transportation problem research paper, present: Operations Manager, Sr. Designer, Reid Signs, Inc. one the premier small sign companies in the world.

Completely revamped estimating, scheduling, project management, Invoicing. September 1999 to January 2005: Designer, TubeArt Signs Sports Displays, Seattle, Washington. Responsibilities included all aspects of design, fabrication and production/shop drawings, i.e., design and production drawings (including revising and converting architectural drawings to documentation essays, workable production prints) for major shopping centers, NFL football stadiums, MLB Baseball stadiums, and many international and dissertion definition local companies). Winner, Merit Award, 2001 ISA Sign design Competition, Honorable Mention 2002. Two and documentation three times the unit 3 coursework production rate over other designers within the company. October 1998 to August 1999: Chief Designer, Manager, Commercial Operations, Sign Service Company, Hayden, Idaho. Fifth Place, ISA Sign Design Competition, 1999 (see “Signs of the documentation essays Times”, June 1999, page 89), built and launched a company web site; full responsibility for management, scheduling, and essays for ucf purchasing for the commercial department, plus supporting two salespeople with designs. Equally competent in electrical, commercial, vinyl design, and many elements of production. Superb hand lettering and pin striping skills. Played a major role in essays developing this small company’s strong national reputation.

Designs took two honorable mentions in Signs of the Times Electric Sign Contest. Also revised sales, purchasing, work order, production, credit, collection and scheduling systems. Full responsibility for all scheduling, sales, production, deadline coordination, partial responsibility for writing company policy and philosophy of business manual. Instituted weekly scheduling, production, and sales meetings to assist in zero-tolerance error factor. 1988-1990: Operations Manager, Silver Dollar Signs, Reno, Nevada. Began as sign designer in 1988 with second largest sign company in dissertion definition Reno (50 employees. $3M in documentation essays sales).

Promoted to commercial manager in three months, supervising sign, design and screen printing depts. Developed new scheduling system resulting in faster turnaround and lower costs. Set up new credit and collection system later adopted by entire company. Eventually promoted to General Manager, initiated new pricing mark-ups, revised order processing and production formats, reduced overruns from tale, 40% to 6%, and documentation essays cut non-productive hours from 35% to 13% in 3 months. Reorganized upper management, and took over dissertion, as Operations Manager. Instituted new computerized estimating system. 1981-1988: Owner, The Sign Studio, Redding, California. Starting in 1981, grew business from one-man operation to essays, Shasta County's largest commercial and electric sign shop. Left area because of faltering tourism and good ideas logging economy. Full responsibility for entire operation.

Featured in Nov/Dec 1986 Signcraft magazine. EDUCATION: Dean’s List, B.A., Graphic Design, San Jose State University. MANAGERIAL AND SALES SKILLS: Sales and Sales Management, Production Coordination and Scheduling, Purchasing, Credit and Collections, Estimating, Employee Incentive Systems, strong management, organizational, communication and analytical skills, good with people. Strong, positive attitude. GRAPHICS AND MARKETING SKILLS: *Proficient with IBM computers, Excel, Word; Gerber and Graphic Advantage Sign software and hardware, CorelDraw, Paint Shop Pro, Corel Photo Paint, MS Publisher, Adobe Photo Shop, Microsoft FrontPage, GoldMine Sales Software administrator, beginning FormZ and Maya 3D software. *Strong copywriting (press releases, ad-copy, magazine articles, stories, informational and systems), direct mail, newsletters, public relations. Documentation Essays. Published writer. *Excellent communication skills, verbal and written.

Extensive public speaking experience. *Graphics skills include CAS, desktop publishing, Illustration, design, web design, layout, typography, photo manipulation, photography, lettering and calligraphy, logo design and business unit 3 coursework development, presentation renderings and extensive sign knowledge. Documentation. Winner of numerous national and as applied unit international design awards. Essays. Signcraft magazine, Dec. '86: Cover and four-page article on as applied 3 coursework business and signs. Essays. Signcraft Magazine, Jan. '87: participant in design/cost workshop article. Signs of the Times Magazine, June '86, July '87, April '89: national truck lettering awards. Jobber/Retailer Magazine, June '88: Contributor, article on Truck signage and compare essay about two countries identification. Sign Business Magazine, July '92: Showcase.

Sign Business Magazine, Dec. '92: Portfolio. Signs of the Times, 1992: Electric Sign Contest: Two national awards for documentation electrical sign design. Sign Business Magazine, June '94: Author, Juggling Made Easier, article on pricing signs. Washington Winestyle, June '94: Author, of Wine and Art, article on wine label art. North Idaho Business Journal, 1994: Featured on Cover story on 3 coursework Idaho's rural renaissance.

Signs of the documentation essays Times, Sign Design Gallery, 1994: two award winning signs featured. Editorial Cartoonist, Coeur d'Alene Press, September, 1995 - April 1996. 1999: 5 th place, ISA Sign Design Competition. 2001: Merit Award (top 10), ISA Sign Design Competition. Handmaid's Tale Essay. 2002: Honorable Mention, ISA Sign Design Competition.

COMMUNITY ACIVITIES AND ORGANIZATIONS: Co-founder, 1991, Tips for documentation essays Success Networking Business Club. Co-founder, 1994, ToughLove of essays for ucf Coeur d'Alene, a parent support Group. Member, Board of Directors. Orientation and Group Leader. Co-founder, 1994 Kootenai County Youth Task Force. Member, Board of Directors. 1994, Kootenai County Arts Council, Member, Board of documentation Directors. Appointee, Mayor's Commission on the Arts, City of Coeur d'Alene, 1995. Secretary, Powertipps Leads Networking group, 1998.

Member, Cd'A Chamber of Commerce Technology Fair Committee, 1998. Member and Interim Chairman, Cd'A Chamber of Commerce Sales Leadership Committee, 1998. Essays For Ucf. Member, Business Network International (BNI) referral organization 1999. Associate, Society of Environmental Graphic Designers (SEGD), 2000. 2002 to present: Host for Seattle Ken Wilber Meetup, Philosophical Discussion group. 2004: Founder and Director , SeattleIntegral: a 70+ member integral salon dedicated to turning Integral Theory into Integral Action. Documentation. 2004: Co-founder, iCAN, the essays for ucf Integral Cable Access Network, a 14-city coalition of cable access television shows on Integral Theory and Practice. Have actively displayed wildlife, Landscape, and automotive paintings in galleries.

Frequently commissioned to documentation essays, do Exotic Automobile portraits for private parties. Illustrated Resort Wine Label series for national producer of resort wines. Unit. Free lance illustration, computer and hand generated. United States Masters Swimming Program, competitive swimmer.

resume op mail ru PERSONAL RESUME FOR WAYNE A. GRUDEM. 602-850-8000 (Phoenix Seminary office) 602-850-8080 (Phoenix Seminary fax) Born: Feb. 11, 1948, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin.

Married: June 6, 1969 to Margaret White (born 10/31/48), Eau Claire, Wisconsin. Children: Elliot (1974), Oliver (1977), Alexander (1980) B.A.: Harvard University, 1970 (cum laude) M.Div.: Westminster Seminary (Philadelphia), 1973. D.D. (honorary): Westminster Seminary (Philadelphia), 2011. Ph.D.: University of documentation Cambridge, England, 1979 (New Testament)

Dissertation: “The Gift of Prophecy in good for a, 1 Corinthians” Supervisor: Professor C. F. D. Essays! Moule. 1977-81: Assistant Professor of compare and contrast essay Theological Studies, Bethel College, St. Documentation Essays! Paul, Minnesota. 1981-2001: Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, Illinois. 1981-87: Assistant, then (1984-) Associate Professor of New Testament. 1987-91: Associate Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology. 1991-2001: Professor of as applied unit Biblical and Theological Studies. 1998-2000: Chairman, Department of Biblical and Systematic Theology. 2001 – Research Professor of Theology and essays, Biblical Studies, Phoenix Seminary, Phoenix, Arizona. Dec.

12, 1974 (Baptist General Conference) Ministry and related experience: 1967-68: President, Harvard-Radcliffe Christian Fellowship. 1968 (summer): Pastoral Assistant/Youth Ministry, First Reformed Church (RCA), Mt. Vernon, NY. 1970-71: Hebrew tutor, Fuller Seminary, Pasadena, CA. 1970-71: Volunteer staff, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship (working on Cal Tech campus, Pasadena, CA) 1972 (summer): Assistant Pastor, Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church, Westfield, NJ.

1975 (summer): Teacher, Christian Ethics: Schloss Mittersill, Austria (International Fellowship of Evangelical Students) 1988 (June): Chavanne Scholar, Hankamer School of paper Business, Baylor University [invited contributor to week-long colloquium on Biblical Principles and Economics: The Foundations] 1987-89: Deacon (1989) and documentation essays, regular adult Sunday School teacher (1987-89) First Baptist Church, Libertyville, IL (Southern Baptist) 1989-90: Steering Council member, Vineyard Christian Fellowship, Mundelein, Illinois. 1990-92 Elder, Vineyard Christian Fellowship, Mundelein, IL. 1993 (summer): Interim Pastor, Calvary Church of the Pacific (Baptist General Conference), Aiea, Hawaii. 2003, 2005: Faculty member: Campus Crusade for Christ summer staff training, Ft. Collins, Colorado. 2000-2001 Elder, Crossroads Church [formerly First Baptist Church], Libertyville, Illinois (Southern Baptist)

1999- 2002 Member of Speaker Team, FamilyLife. 2002- Regular adult Bible class teacher, Scottsdale Bible Church, Scottsdale, AZ. 2004-2006 Elder, Scottsdale Bible Church, Scottsdale, AZ. Eagle Scout and Vigil Honor, Boy Scouts of America (1965) Outstanding Young Men of America (1982) Participant in International Council on essays for ucf, Biblical Inerrancy Summits I, II, III (1978, 1982, 1986) Who’s Who in Religion, 1992-93. Member: Evangelical Theological Society; Tyndale Fellowship; Society for Biblical Literature. 1979-83: Board Member, Mission: Moving Mountains, Eden Prairie, MN.

1983-85: President of the Board, Christian Heritage Academy, Northbrook, IL. (co-founder; the school opened in 1984) 1995-99 President, Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. (co-founder, 1987; vice-president, 1999- 2002; board member, 1987-present) 1988-90: Secretary-Treasurer, Institute for documentation essays, Advanced Christian Studies. 1999 President, Evangelical Theological Society. (program chairman, 1998; exec. Transportation Problem Research Paper! committee member, 1997-2003) 1999 – Member of Translation Oversight Committee, English Standard Version (an evangelical revision of the documentation 1971 Revised Standard Version, sponsored by for a Crossway Books, published October, 2001) 2002 – Board member, Good News Publishers/ Crossway Books, Wheaton, Ill. 2005 Senior Consulting Editor, Journal for Biblical Manhood and essays, Womanhood. 2005-08 General Editor, ESV Study Bible.

BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR WAYNE A. GRUDEM. The Gift of Prophecy in 1 Corinthians (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1982). The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today (Eastbourne, England: Kingsway Publications; and Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, 1988). The First Epistle of Peter, Tyndale New Testament Commentary Series (Leicester: InterVarsity; and Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.) Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, edited by handmaid's John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Wheaton: Crossway, 1991), xxviii + 566 pages. [Winner of documentation “Book of the dissertion Year” award from Christianity Today in 1992, as the book that had the documentation most significant impact on the evangelical community in 1991] Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Leicester, UK: IVP, and compare essay, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994). (Now also published in Korean, Portuguese, Arabic, Russian, Spanish, Romanian, French, and Arabic. Documentation! Several other foreign language translations are under contract and in process: Hindi, German, Mandarin, Tamil, Amharic, Italian, Tajik, Nepali.) [New printing with glossary at prompts, end and documentation, re-designed cover, Nov., 2000.] Over 420,000 copies in print by handmaid's prompts April, 2011. Are Miraculous Gifts for Today?

Four Views (editor). Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996. Contributors are Richard Gaffin (cessationist), Robert Saucy (“open but cautious”), Sam Storms (Third Wave), and Doug Oss (Pentecostal/charismatic). Bible Doctrine, edited by Jeff Purswell. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999. (A short version of Systematic Theology.) Now translated into Chinese and Portuguese. The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy: Muting the documentation essays Masculinity of God’s Words, co-authored with Vern Poythress (Nashville: Broadman Holman, 2000). The Gift of good ideas thesis paper Prophecy in essays, the New Testament and Today: Revised Edition (Wheaton: Crossway, 2000). (This edition includes six new appendices comprising about compare and contrast about, 70 pages, adding new historical material and documentation essays, responding to some critiques of the compare essay 1988 edition.) Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood (editor). Wheaton: Crossway, 2002. Pastoral Leadership for Manhood and Womanhood (co-editor with Dennis Rainey).

Wheaton: Crossway, 2002. Business for the Glory of God: The Bible’s Teaching on the Moral Goodness of Business (Wheaton: Crossway, 2003) Evangelical Feminism and Biblical Truth: An Analysis of documentation essays Over 100 Disputed Questions (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2004) (856 pages) The TNIV and the Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy, co-authored with Vern Poythress (Nashville: Broadman Holman, 2004). (A revision of definition our 2000 book, The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy, with over 100 pages of new material on the TNIV.) Christian Beliefs: Twenty Basics Every Christian Should Know , by Wayne Grudem, edited by Elliot Grudem (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, and Leicester, England: InterVarsity Press, forthcoming Nov. 1, 2005). 150 pages. Why Is My Choice of a Bible Translation So Important? by Wayne Grudem with Jerry Thacker (Louisville, KY: CBMW, 2005). Evangelical Feminism: A New Path to Liberalism?

Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2006. Countering the Claims of Evangelical Feminism: Over 40 Biblical Responses. Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2006. ESV Study Bible, general editor (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008). 2752 pages, 95 contributors. Winner of “Book of the Year” awards from essays, Evangelical Christian Publishers Association and dissertion, from World Magazine. Politics – According to the Bible: A Comprehensive Resource for documentation essays, Understanding Modern Political Issues in Light of Scripture (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, Sept., 2010).

Voting as a Christian: The Social Issues (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, forthcoming, Feb., 2012). Voting as a Christian: The Economic and Foreign Policy Issues (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, forthcoming, Feb., 2012). “Letter to a Prospective Seminarian,” Christianity Today (August 25, 1972) 18-19. “Alphabetical Reference List for for a paper, Old Testament Apocrypha and documentation, Pseudepigrapha,” JETS 19:4 (Fall 1976) 297-313. Review of Hans Conzelmann, 1 Corinthians, in Themelios 1:2 (Spring 1976) 56-57. “A Response to Gerhard Dautzenberg on dissertion definition, 1 Cor. Documentation! 12:10,” Biblische Zeitschrift, N.F., 22:2 (1978) 253-270. “1 Cor. 14:20-25: Prophecy and ideas for a thesis, Tongues as Signs of God’s Attitude,” Westminster Theological Journal 41:2 (Spring 1979) 381-396. Review of documentation essays Greg Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical View, for Westminster Theological Journal 42:1 (Fall 1979) 247-251.

Review of essays for ucf George W. Knight III, The New Testament Teaching on the Role Relationship of Men and Women, for documentation essays, JETS 22:4 (Dec. 1979) 375-376. “Forgiveness: Forever and Today,” HIS (Feb. 1980) 15, 28. “Don’t Muzzle the Ox with Chicken Feed,” Eternity 31:8 (Sept. Ideas For A! 1980) 63-64. (Title chosen by editor without my knowledge). Reprinted: Leadership 11:2 (Spring 1981) 66-67. “Must Women Be Silent in Church?” The Standard (Arlington Heights, IL) 71:3 (March 1981) 30-31 and 71:4 (April 1981) 15-17.

“Can All Believers Prophesy?” Paraclete (Springfield, Mo.) 15 (Fall 1981) 31-32. Review of James Boice, The Sovereign God, in Themelios 6:2 (Jan. Documentation Essays! 1981) 31-32. Review of James Boice, God the Redeemer, in dissertion, Themelios 6:2 (Jan. 1981) 32. Review of David Hill, New Testament Prophecy, in Themelios 7:2 (Jan. Documentation Essays! 1982) 25-26. “Scripture’s Self-Attestation and the Problem of Formulating a Doctrine of Scripture,” in Scripture and Truth, edited by D. As Applied! A. Carson and John Woodbridge (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1983), pp. 19-59. “Hierarchy,” “Keys of the Kingdom,” and documentation, “States of Jesus Christ” in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984) 510; 604-05; 1052-54. Review of Margaret Howe, Women and Church Leadership, in JETS 27:2 (June 1984) 223-227.

“A Response to ideas for a thesis paper, Contextualization and Revelational Epistemology,” in Hermeneutics, Inerrancy, and essays, the Bible: Papers from ICBI Summit II, ed. Earl Radmacher and Robert D. Preuss (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984) 753-764. “Does kephal? (“head”) Mean “Source” or “Authority Over” in Greek Literature? A Survey of 2,336 Examples,” Appendix in The Role Relationship of Men and Women (rev. Good Ideas For A! ed.), George W. Knight III, (Chicago: Moody, 1985) 49-80. (same article as above) in Trinity Journal 6 NS (Spring 1985) 38-59.

“Biblical Reasons for Sending Children to A Christian School,” Christian School Comment, Vol. 16, No. 4 (December 1985). “The Courage to Say No,” Christianity Today 29:10 (July 12, 1985) 58. “The Existence of God,” The Evangelical Beacon (March/April 1986) 6-7. “New Testament Prophecy: What and How?” Evangelical Times (Thornton Heath, England) (April 1986) 12-14 (3400 words).

“The Bible and Economic Decisions, Part 1: Working: Combining Hard Work with Trust in God,” Moody Monthly (May 1986) 34-41. “The Bible and Economic Decisions, Part 2: Spending: Combining Enjoyment of God’s Earth with Care for essays, Others,” Moody Monthly (June 1986) 36-40. “The Bible and Economic Decisions, Part 3: Owning: Combining Care for as applied business 3 coursework, Possessions with Love for God,” Moody Monthly (July 1986) 64-67. “The Unseen World is not a Myth,” Christianity Today (July 11, 1986) 24. “Aging Inside Out,” Christianity Today (September 1986) 32. “Foreword” to Word and documentation essays, Spirit: The Bible and the Gift of Prophecy Today by Roy Clements (Leicester: UCCF Booklets, 1986) 3-4. “Prophecy—Yes, but Teaching—No: Paul’s Consistent Advocacy of Women’s Participation Without Governing Authority,” JETS 30:1 (March 1987) 11-23. “Foreword” to Women in good ideas thesis paper, the Church by Samuele Bacchiocchi (Berrien Springs, MI: Biblical Perspectives, 1987). [Author added last chapter, differing with my position, without my knowledge, after I sent the foreword.] “Christ Preaching Through Noah: 1 Peter 3:19-20 in essays, the Light of dissertion Dominant Themes in Jewish Literature,” Trinity Journal 7:2 (Fall 1986) 3-31.

Review of David E. Essays! Aune, Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World, Evangelical Quarterly 59:4 (Oct. 1987) 351-55. “The Bible and the Defense Budget,” Eternity (March 1988) 41. “Why Christians Can Still Prophesy,” Christianity Today (Sept. 16, 1988) 29-35. “God’s Eternity: Timeless Yet Timely,” Moody Monthly (Sept. 1988) 40-44. “God’s Omnipresence: Here, There, and Everywhere,” Moody Monthly (Oct. 1988) 36-40. “God’s Unchangeableness: No Shadow of Turning,” Moody Monthly (Nov. 1988) 32-37.

“God’s Omniscience: Who Knows? He Knows!” Moody Monthly (Dec. 1988) 00-00. “The Pain of the Cross,” Decision (March 1989) 7-8. “God’s Independence: Complete in Himself,” Moody Monthly (Jan. 1989) 36-39. “God’s Truthfulness: As Good As His Word,” Moody Monthly (Feb. Dissertion! 1989) 34-39. “The Uses of Wealth: Investing in What Lasts,” Christianity Today (May 12, 1989) 31-34 (Part of Christianity Today Institute Panel on essays, Economics and the Bible). [reprinted in The Midas Trap, edited by handmaid's prompts David Neff (Wheaton: Victor, 1990) 55-63.] “How an documentation essays, Economic System Can Be Compatible with Scripture,” in Biblical Principles and Economics: The Foundations, edited by Richard Chewning (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1989), 27-52. “The Meaning of kephal? (“Head”): A Response to as applied, Recent Studies,” Trinity Journal 11NS (Spring, 1990), 3-72. [reprinted in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Wheaton: Crossway, 1991), 425-68.] “Evangelicalism,” in Faith and essays, Renewal (July-Aug., 1990, 10-12). “Should Prophets have a Part in for a paper, Church Government?” Equipping the documentation essays Saints (Fall, 1990), 7-9, 21-22.

“Can Ordinary People Understand the Bible?,” Table Talk (Ligonier Ministries, Orlando, FL) 14:2 (Feb., 1990), 47-48. “He Did Not Descend Into Hell: A Plea for Following Scripture Instead of the Apostles’ Creed,” JETS 34/1 (March, 1991), 103-113. “1 Peter 3:1-7: Wives like Sarah and Husbands Who Honor Them,” in John Piper and Wayne Grudem, editors, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism (Wheaton, Ill: Crossway, 1991). “Prophecy in the Church,” Faith and Renewal 16:1 (July/Aug. 1991), 3-8. “Notes on Romans” in The Spirit-Filled Life Study Bible, edited by as applied business 3 coursework Jack Hayford. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991. 50 Crucial Questions on Manhood and Womanhood, by John Piper and documentation, Wayne Grudem. Prompts! Wheaton, Ill.: Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, 1992. [booklet taken from documentation, Chapter 2 of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood]

Can Our Differences Be Settled? A Detailed Response to the Evangelical Feminist Position Statement of Christians for Biblical Equality, by John Piper and Wayne Grudem. Wheaton, Ill.: Council on Biblical Manhood and handmaid's tale essay prompts, Womanhood, 1992. [booklet taken from Chapter 26 of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood] “Does God Still Give Revelation Today?” Charisma, Sept, 1992, pp. Essays! 38-42. “The Vineyard’s Response to The Standard: A Response to the Critique of John Armstrong in The Standard, a Publication of the Baptist General Conference.” Anaheim, Cal.: The Association of Vineyard Churches, 1992. (37-page booklet; 17,000 words). Power and as applied unit 3 coursework, Truth: A Response to the Critiques of Vineyard Teaching and documentation essays, Practice by D. A. Carson, James Montgomery Boice, and John H. Armstrong in Power Religion (Anaheim, Cal.: Association of essays for ucf Vineyard Churches, 1993). (65 page booklet, 32,000 words). (available at http://www.vineyardusa.org/upload/PowerReligion.pdf) “What is the documentation Real Meaning of a ‘Word of Wisdom’ and a ‘Word of Knowledge’?” Ministries Today (Jan/Feb, 1993), pp. 60-65. [Reprinted in ideas paper, Equipping the Saints, . 1993] “Should Christians Expect Miracles Today?

Objections and Answers from the Bible” in The Kingdom and the Power, edited by Gary S. Greig and Kevin Springer (Ventura, Cal.: Regal Books, 1993), pp. Essays! 55-110. “Notes on 2 Corinthians” for New Geneva Study Bible (R. Dissertion! C. Sproul, general editor). (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1995). “Perseverance of the Saints: A Case Study from essays, Hebrews 6:4-6 and the Other Warning Passages in Hebrews.” In The Grace of God and the Bondage of the dissertion definition Will, edited by Thomas Schreiner and Bruce Ware (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1995), vol. 1, pp. 133-182. “But What Should Women Do in the Church?” CBMW NEWS 1:2 (Nov., 1995), 1-7.

“The Meaning of “Head” in the Bible: A Simple Question No Egalitarian Can Answer.” CBMW NEWS 1:3 (June, 1996), 8. “What’s Wrong with ‘Gender Neutral’ Bible Translations? A Review of the New Revised Standard Version,” CBMW NEWS 1:3 (June, 1996), pp. 3-5. “The Myth of ‘Mutual Submission.’”CBMW NEWS 1:4 (Oct., 1996), 1-4. “Asbury Professor Advocates Egalitarianism but Undermines Biblical Authority: A Critique of David Thompson’s ‘Trajectory’ Hermeneutic.”CBMW NEWS 2:1 (Dec., 1996), 8-12. “The Nature of documentation Divine Eternity: A Response to William Craig.” Philosophia Christi 20:1 (Spring, 1997), 55-70. “Comparing the two NIV’s” by Wayne Grudem. World (Apr. 19, 1997), pp. 14-18. “NIV Controversy: Participants Sign Landmark Agreement,” CBMW NEWS (June, 1997), pp.

1, 3-6. “Do Inclusive Language Bibles Distort Scripture? Yes (by Wayne Grudem); No (by Grant Osborne)” Christianity Today (Oct 27, 1997), pp. Ideas For A Paper! 26-39. “What’s Wrong with Gender-Neutral Bible Translations?” (Libertyville, Ill.: CBMW, 1997). 25-page booklet. bibliography incomplete: see esp.

CBMW NEWS. “A Response to Mark L. Strauss’s Evaluation of the Colorado Springs Translation Guidelines,” JETS [need date, pages] bibliography incomplete for 1999. “God’s Intense Jealousy,” Decision (February, 2000), 34. “Do We Act As If We Really Believe that ‘The Bible Alone, and the Bible in Its Entirety, Is the Word of God Written’”? JETS 43/1 (March, 2000), pp. 5-26. (This essay was the 1999 presidential address to documentation essays, the Evangelical Theological Society, given Nov.

17, 1999, in Danvers, Mass.) “Prophecy, Prophets,” in dissertion definition, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, edited by essays T. Desmond Alexander, Brian S. Rosner, et al. (IVP-UK, 2000), 701-710. “The Meaning of kefalh, (“head”): An Analysis of essays for ucf New Evidence, Real and Alleged,” JETS 44/1 (March, 2001), 25-65. “Upon Leaving: Thoughts on essays, Marriage and transportation research, Ministry,” in Trinity Magazine 2 (Summer, 2001), 20-21. (published by Trinity International University, Deerfield, Illinois) “A Baptist Because of the Bible,” in Why I am a Baptist, edited by documentation Tom J. Nettles and Russell Moore (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2001), 201-208. “Motives for Obedience to God in the Christian Life,” in Leaders in a Changing World (publication of Phoenix Seminary), Fall, 2001, pp. 6-8. “Should we omit the masculine details of meaning that modern culture finds offensive?” in essays for ucf, Evangelicals Now (Thornton Heath, Surrey, England), Aug. 2002, p. 22. Essays! (1000 word article on the TNIV, written as the “con” half of a pro-con pair of essay articles on the TNIV, but then published as a book review when the “con” author dropped out.) “The ‘Gender-Neutral’ TNIV Bible: What’s the Controversy?” in Leaders magazine (Phoenix Seminary, Scottsdale, AZ) 2 (Spring 2002), 6-7, 11. “The Key Issues in the Manhood-Womanhood Controversy,” in Building Strong Families, edited by essays Dennis Rainey (Wheaton: Crossway, 2002), 29-88.

“The Key Issues in handmaid's tale prompts, the Manhood-Womanhood Controversy, and the Way Forward,” in Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood (edited by Wayne Grudem), Wheaton: Crossway, expected in 2002. “The Myth of ‘Mutual Submission’ as an Interpretation of Ephesians 5:21? in documentation essays, Biblical Foundations for essay, Manhood and Womanhood (edited by documentation Wayne Grudem), Wheaton: Crossway, expected in 2002. “The Meaning of research kefalh, (“head”): An Analysis of New Evidence, Real and Alleged,” in Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood (edited by documentation Wayne Grudem), Wheaton: Crossway, expected in 2002. Good Ideas For A! [this is the documentation essays same as the article in JETS 44/1 (Mar., 2001), 25-65, except a response to Anthony Thiselton’s commentary on 1 Corinthians is added on pp. 194-199]. “Why I’m Against the TNIV,” Charisma 28:4 (November, 2002), pp. 87, 110. [article requested by editor of compare and contrast about two countries Charisma; title not chosen by me].

“When, Why, and For What Should We Draw New Boundaries?” in Beyond the Bounds: Open Theism and the Undermining of Biblical Christianity, edited by John Piper, Justin Taylor, and Paul Helseth (Wheaton: Crossway, 2003), pp. 339-370. “How Business in Itself Can Glorify God,” in On Kingdom Business: Transforming Missions Through Entrepreneurial Strategies , edited by Tetsunao Yamamori and Kenneth A. Eldred (Wheaton: Crossway, 2003), 127-151. “Should We Move Beyond the New Testament to a Better Ethic? An Analysis of William J. Essays! Webb, Slaves, Women and Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermeneutics of Cultural Analysis (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2001),” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 47/2 (June, 2004), 299-346. “Is God Happy?” in Leaders (a publication of Phoenix Seminary) May, 2004, p. 10. “Is Evangelical Feminism the New Path to Liberalism? Some Disturbing Warning Signs” JBMW Spring, 2004), pp. 35-84. “What Do Evangelicals Seek?” Commentary published at Foxnews.com, Nov. 18, 2004.

“Gender Confusion: The Way Forward,” NewFrontiers Magazine (Hove, East Sussex, UK) 2:9 (Dec., 2004), 7-11, 46-47. “Changing God’s Words,” World magazine (Feb. 26, 2005), 30-36. “Are Only Some Words of Scripture Breathed Out By God? Why Plenary Inspiration Favors ‘Essentially Literal’ Bible Translation,” in Translating Truth (Wheaton: Crossway, 2005). “Foreword” and “Response” to Who’s Afraid of the Holy Spirit?, edited by M. Compare About Two Countries! James Sawyer and essays, Daniel B. Wallace (Dallas, TX: Biblical Studies Press, 2005). “Dangerous First Step” (interview by essays for ucf Marvin Olasky), World, Nov. 25, 2006, 34-36. “Prayer and essays, the Election,” published on prompts, Townhall.com and Crosswalk.com, Nov.

3, 2006. “Right and documentation essays, Wrong Interpretation of the Bible: Some Suggestions for Pastors and Bible Teachers,” in Preach the dissertion Word: Essays on essays, Expository Preaching In Honor of R. Kent Hughes, edited by as applied business Leland Ryken and Todd Wilson (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2007), pp. Essays! 54-75. “Why Evangelicals Should Support Mitt Romney.” Townhall.com editorial, Oct. Problem Research! 18, 2007. “Overview of Biblical Ethics” (13 articles) in ESV Study Bible (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008), pp. 0000-0000. Documentation Essays! Co-author and editor of these articles. “Notes on the Gospel of Luke” in ESV Study Bible (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008), pp. 0000-0000. Zondervan Get an A! Study Guide: Systematic Theology, by Wayne Grudem and Erik Thoennes (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008).

“Foreword” to Radical Womanhood: Feminine Faith in a Feminist World, by Carolyn McCulley (Chicago: Moody Press, 2008), pp. 9-13. “Why It Is Never Right to Lie: An Example of John Frame’s Influence on My Approach to Ethics,” in Speaking the Truth in Love: The Theology of John Frame (Festschrift for compare and contrast essay about two countries, John Frame), edited by John J. Hughes (Phillipsburg, NJ: P R, 2009), pp. 778-801. “Foreword” to documentation essays, Should Christians Embrace Evolution, edited by Norman Nevin (Nottingham, UK: IVP, 2009), pp. 9-10. “An Introduction to the Holy Spirit,” introductory doctrinal overview written for TheologyNetwork.org, the online center for essays for ucf, doctrinal teaching of the documentation essays Universities and Colleges Christian Fellowship (UCCF) in the UK. http://www.theologynetwork.org/christian-beliefs/the-holy-spirit-and-christian-living/an-introduction-to-the-holy-spirit.htm.

“The Perspicuity of Scripture” (the John Wenham Lecture for the Tyndale Fellowship, Cambridge, England, July, 2009), Themelios 34:3 (2009), pp. Definition! 288-308. Primary author of drafts that were the basis of the Supreme Court legal brief, “Brief of Amici Curiae Evangelical Scholars (Officers and 24 Former Presidents of the Evangelical Theological Society), Evangelicals for Social Action, and National Association of Evangelicals, in Support of Petitioner,” in the Case Christian Legal Society V. Martinez, argued before the Supreme Court of the United States April 19, 2010. “What Is at Risk for documentation, Business If We Lose a Christian Worldview?,” co-authored with Barry Asmus, in Business Ethics Today: Adding a Christian Worldview as Found in the Westminster Confession of Faith (Philadelphia: Center for Christian Ethics in thesis, Business and Westminster Theological Seminary, 2010), pp. 111-127. “Pleasing God by Our Obedience: A Neglected New Testament Teaching,” in For the documentation essays Fame of God’s Name: Essays in Honor of John Piper (Wheaton: Crossway, 2010), pp. 272-292.

“My take: Fred Phelps is wrong about the unit 3 coursework gospel, right about the law.” Invited op-ed article posted at essays, CNN Belief Blog, Oct. 7, 2010. http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10/07/my-take-fred-phelps-is-wrong-about-the-gospel-right-about-the-law/ “Property Rights Inherent in the Eight Commandment Are Essential for Human Flourishing,” by Barry Asmus and Wayne Grudem, published in Business Ethics Today: Stealing (Philadelphia: Center for paper, Christian Business Ethics Today, 2011, pp. Documentation Essays! 119-134. “Biblical Evidence for the Eternal Submission of the Son to the Father.” 14,675 words. Forthcoming in book of essays on the Trinity edited by H. Wayne House and problem research paper, Dennis Jowers. “The Advantages of the ESV Translation,” submitted to Andreas Kostenberger and David Croteau, for essays, forthcoming BH book on Four Bible Translations (NIV, Holman Christian Standard Bible, ESV, NLT). (15,000 words) “Biblical Principles Regarding Economic Policies,” in The Christian Lawyer, publication of the Christian Legal Society. (January, 2012). New “Foreword” written for republication of Grudem, Evangelical Feminism and business unit 3 coursework, Biblical Truth by Crossway Books, forthcoming, 2012.

A book on “A Permanent Solution to Poverty in Poor Nations,” co-authored with Barry Asmus.

43 Resume Tips That Will Help You Get Hired. When you haven’t updated your resume in a while, it can be hard to know where to start. Documentation Essays? What experiences and accomplishments should you include for the jobs you’ve got your eye on? What new resume rules and trends should you be following? And seriously, one page or two? Well, search no more: We’ve compiled all the resume advice you need into one place. Read on tale essay for tips and tricks that’ll make sure you craft a winning resume—and help you land a job. Your resume should not have every work experience you’ve ever had listed on it. Think of your resume not as a comprehensive list of documentation essays your career history, but as a marketing document selling you as the perfect person for the job. For each resume you send out, you’ll want to highlight only the ideas for a thesis paper, accomplishments and skills that are most relevant to the job at documentation essays, hand (even if that means you don’t include all of your experience). Job search expert Lily Zhang explains more about what it means to tailor your resume here . 2. But Keep a Master List of thesis All Jobs.

Since you’ll want to be swapping different information in documentation essays, and out business, depending on the job you’re applying to, keep a resume master list on your computer where you keep any information you’ve ever included on a resume: old positions, bullet points tailored for documentation different applications, special projects that only sometimes make sense to include. Handmaid's? Then, when you’re crafting each resume, it’s just a matter of cutting and pasting relevant information together. Think of this as your brag file . 3. Put the Best Stuff “Above the Fold” In marketing speak, “above the fold” refers to what you see on essays the front half of a folded newspaper (or, in the digital age, before you scroll down on a website), but basically it’s your first impression of a document. In resume speak, it means you should make sure your best experiences and accomplishments are visible on the top third of your resume. This top section is what the compare and contrast, hiring manager is going to see first—and what will serve as a hook for documentation someone to keep on reading. So focus on putting your best, most relevant experiences first—and then check out these five other marketing tricks to get your resume noticed . According to Zhang , the only occasion when an objective section makes sense is when you’re making a huge career change and good thesis paper, need to explain from the get-go why your experience doesn’t match up with the position you’re applying to. In every other case? Consider whether a summary statement would be right for you —or just nix it altogether to save space and focus on making the rest of your resume stellar. There are lots of essays different ways to dissertion definition organize the information on your resume, but the good old reverse chronological (where your most recent experience is listed first) is still your best bet. Essays? Unless it’s absolutely necessary in ideas for a thesis paper, your situation, skip the skills-based resume—hiring managers might wonder what you’re hiding.

The two- (or more!) page resume is documentation essays a hotly debated topic , but the bottom line is this—you want the information here to be concise, and essay about, making yourself keep it to documentation essays one page is a good way to force yourself to problem research do this. If you truly have enough relevant and important experience, training, and credentials to showcase on more than one page of your resume, then go for it. But if you can tell the same story in less space? Do. If you’re struggling, check out essays, these tips for cutting your content down , or work with a designer to see how you can organize your resume to fit more in essays for ucf, less space. Can’t figure out how to documentation essays tell your whole story on one page, or want to be able to include some visual examples of your work? Instead of trying to as applied business unit have your resume cover everything, cover the most important details on documentation that document, and then include a link to your personal website , where you can dive more into what makes you the ideal candidate. Good Ideas Thesis Paper? We’ll talk about getting creative in order to stand out in a minute. But the most basic principle of good resume formatting and design?

Keep it simple. Use a basic but modern font, like Helvetica, Arial, or Century Gothic. Essays? Make your resume easy on hiring managers’ eyes by using a font size between 10 and 12 and leaving a healthy amount of and contrast two countries white space on documentation the page. You can use a different font or typeface for essays for ucf your name, your resume headers, and the companies for which you’ve worked, but keep it simple and keep it consistent. Your main focus here should be on readability for the hiring manager. That being said, you should feel free to… Really want your resume stand out from the sea of Times New Roman?

Yes, creative resumes—like infographics, videos, or presentations—or resumes with icons or graphics can set you apart, but you should use them thoughtfully. If you’re applying through an ATS, keep to the standard formatting without any bells and whistles so the computer can read it effectively. If you’re applying to a more traditional company, don’t get too crazy, but feel free to add some tasteful design elements or a little color to documentation make it pop. No matter what, don’t do it unless you’re willing to put in the time, creativity, and design work to make it awesome. 10. Make Your Contact Info Prominent.

You don’t need to tale essay include your address on documentation your resume anymore (really!), but you do need to make sure to include a phone number and paper, professional email address (not your work address!) as well as other places the hiring manager can find you on the web, like your LinkedIn profile and essays, Twitter handle. (Implicit in this is that you keep these social media profiles suitable for paper prospective employers.) You’ve heard before that hiring managers don’t spend a lot of documentation time on each individual resume. So help them get as much information as possible, in as little time as possible. These 12 small formatting changes will make a huge difference. Know that design skills aren’t your strong suit but want your resume to unit look stunning? There’s no shame in getting help, so consider working with a professional resume designer.

This is documentation essays arguably the most important document of your job search, so it’s worth getting it exactly right! 13. Keep it Recent, Keep it Relevant. As a rule, you should only show the most recent 10-15 years of your career history and tale essay prompts, only include the experience relevant to the positions to which you are applying. And remember to allocate real estate on your resume according to essays importance. Essays For Ucf? If there’s a choice between including one more college internship or going into essays, more detail about your current role, always choose the and contrast essay about two countries, latter (unless a previous job was more relevant to the one you’re applying to). Essays? 14. No Relevant Experience? No Worries! Don’t panic if you don’t have any experience that fits the handmaid's tale prompts, bill. Instead, Zhang explains , focus your resume on your relevant and transferrable skills along with any related side or academic projects, and documentation essays, then make sure to tale pair it with a strong cover letter telling the documentation, narrative of why you’re ideal for the job.

No matter how long you’ve been in a job, or how much you’ve accomplished there, you shouldn’t have more than five or six bullets in a given section. No matter how good your bullets are, the recruiter just isn’t going to get through them. Check out these tips for writing impressive bullet points . You may be tempted to throw in tons of essays for ucf industry jargon so you sound like you know what you’re talking about, but ultimately you want your resume to be understandable to documentation the average person. Remember that the first person who sees your resume might be a recruiter, an assistant, or even a high-level executive—and you want to be sure that it is readable, relevant, and interesting to essay all of documentation essays them. Use as many facts, figures, and problem research, numbers as you can in your bullet points. How many people were impacted by your work? By what percentage did you exceed your goals?

By quantifying your accomplishments, you really allow the hiring manager to picture the level of documentation work or responsibility you needed to achieve them. Even if you don’t actually work with numbers, here are some secrets to dissertion definition adding more to your resume . People hire performers, so you want to show that you didn’t just do stuff, but that you got stuff done! As you look at documentation essays, your bullet points, think about business 3 coursework, how you can take each statement one step further and add in what the documentation essays, benefit was to as applied business unit 3 coursework your boss or your company. By doing this, you clearly communicate not only what you’re capable of, but also the direct benefit the employer will receive by hiring you. If you’re not sure how to explain your impact, check out these tips for turning your duties into accomplishments . Documentation? Describing soft skills on a resume often starts to sound like a list of meaningless buzzwords, fast. But being a “strong leader” or an “effective communicator” are important characteristics you want to problem research get across. Think about how you can demonstrate these attributes in your bullet points without actually saying them. Zhang demonstrates here how you can show five different qualities with the documentation, same bullet point—try it yourself until you get the result you’re going for! 20.

Don’t Neglect Non-Traditional Work. There’s no law that says you can only put full-time or paid work on your resume. As Applied Business? So, if you’ve participated in a major volunteer role, worked part-time, were hired as a temporary or contract worker , freelanced, or blogged? Absolutely list these things as their own “jobs” within your career chronology. Documentation Essays? If every bullet in your resume starts with “Responsible for,” readers will get bored very quickly.

Use our handy list of better verbs to mix it up ! Use keywords in your resume: Scan the business unit, job description, see what words are used most often, and make sure you’ve included them in your bullet points. Not only is this a self-check that you’re targeting your resume to the job, it’ll make sure you get noticed in applicant tracking systems. Stuck on documentation essays which words to good ideas thesis include? Dump the job description into a tool like TagCrowd , which will analyze and spit out the most used keywords. Essays? What words shouldn’t you include? Detail-oriented, team player, and hard worker—among other vague terms that recruiters say are chronically overused . We bet there’s a better way to tale essay describe how awesome you are. 24. Experience First, Education Second. Unless you’re a recent graduate, put your education after your experience. Chances are, your last couple of jobs are more important and relevant to you getting the job than where you went to college.

25. Also Keep it Reverse Chronological. Usually, you should lay down your educational background by listing the most recent or advanced degree first, working in reverse chronological order. But if older coursework is more specific to the job, list that first to documentation essays grab the reviewer’s attention. Don’t list your graduation dates. The reviewer cares more about whether or not you have the degree than when you earned it. If you graduated from college with high honors, absolutely make note of it. While you don’t need to list your GPA, don’t be afraid to ideas thesis paper showcase that summa cum laude status or the fact that you were in the honors college at your university.

28. Include Continuing or Online Education. Don’t be afraid to include continuing education, professional development coursework, or online courses in your education section, especially if it feels a little light. Documentation? Kelli Orrela explains , “Online courses are a more-than-accepted norm nowadays, and your participation in them can actually show your determination and motivation to get the skills you need for for a paper your career.” Be sure to add a section that lists out all the relevant skills you have for essays a position, including tech skills like HTML and Adobe Creative Suite and tale essay, any industry-related certifications. Just make sure to skip including skills that everyone is expected to have, like using email or Microsoft Word. Doing so will actually make you seem less technologically savvy.

If you have lots of skills related to a position—say, foreign language, software, and leadership skills—try breaking out one of those sections and listing it on its own. Essays? Below your “Skills” section, add another section titled “Language Skills” or “Software Skills,” and detail your experience there. Again—we’re going for skimmability here, folks! Feel free to include an “Interests” section on your resume, but only add those that are relevant to the job. Essays For Ucf? Are you a guitar player with your eye on a music company? Definitely include it. But including your scrapbooking hobby for a tech job at a healthcare company? Don’t even think about documentation essays, it. 32. Beware of Interests That Could Be Controversial.

Maybe you help raise money for your church on the reg. Or perhaps you have a penchant for canvassing during political campaigns. Yes, these experiences show a good amount of problem work ethic—but they could also be discriminated against by someone who disagrees with the cause. Zhang explains here how to weigh the decision of essays whether to include them or not. Do include awards and handmaid's, accolades you’ve received, even if they’re company-specific awards. Just state what you earned them for, e.g., “Earned Gold Award for having the company’s top sales record four quarters in a row.” What about personal achievements—like running a marathon—that aren’t totally relevant but show you’re a driven, hard worker? Zhang shares the proper ways to include them. Gaps and Other Sticky Resume Situations. If you stayed at documentation, a (non-temporary) job for only a matter of months, consider eliminating it from your resume. 3 Coursework? According to documentation The New York Times ’ career coach , leaving a particularly short-lived job or two off your work history shouldn’t hurt, as long as you’re honest about dissertion, your experience if asked in an interview. If you have gaps of a few months in your work history, don’t list the usual start and end dates for documentation each position.

Use years only (2010-2012), or just the number of years or months you worked at and contrast essay, your earlier positions. If you’ve job-hopped frequently, include a reason for leaving next to each position, with a succinct explanation like “company closed,” “layoff due to downsizing,” or “relocated to documentation essays new city.” By addressing the good thesis paper, gaps, you’ll proactively illustrate the reason for your sporadic job movement and essays, make it less of an compare essay about two countries issue. Re-entering the documentation essays, workforce after a long hiatus? This is the perfect opportunity for dissertion definition a summary statement at the top, outlining your best skills and accomplishments. Then, get into your career chronology, without hesitating to essays include part-time or volunteer work. See more tips from ideas paper Jenny Foss for killing it on your comeback resume. Don’t try to creatively fill in gaps on your resume. For example, if you took time out of the workforce to raise kids, don’t list your parenting experience on your resume, a la “adeptly managed the essays, growing pile of laundry” (we’ve seen it). While parenting is as demanding and intense a job as any out there, most corporate decision makers aren’t going to take this section of your resume seriously. 39. Ditch “References Available Upon Request” If a hiring manager is interested in you, he or she will ask you for as applied business unit 3 coursework references—and will assume that you have them.

There’s no need to address the obvious (and doing so might even make you look a little presumptuous!). It should go without saying, but make sure your resume is free and clear of typos. And don’t rely on spell check and grammar check alone—ask family or friends to take a look at it for essays you (or get some tips from an editor on how to perfect your own work ). Dissertion? If emailing your resume, make sure to documentation essays always send a PDF rather than a .doc. That way all of your careful formatting won’t accidentally get messed up when the hiring manager opens it on his or her computer. To make sure it won’t look wonky when you send it off, Google’s head of HR Laszlo Bock suggests, “Look at it in both Google Docs and Word, and then attach it to an email and open it as a preview.” Ready to save your resume and send it off? Save it as “Jane Smith Resume” instead of “Resume.” It’s one less step the good for a, hiring manager has to take. Carve out some time every quarter or so to pull up your resume and make some updates. Have you taken on essays new responsibilities? Learned new skills? Add them in.

When your resume is good for a thesis paper updated on a regular basis, you’re ready to pounce when opportunity presents itself. And, even if you’re not job searching, there are plenty of good reasons to keep this document in documentation essays, tip-top shape. Photo courtesy of essays for ucf Hero Images / Getty Images . Documentation? Erin Greenawald is a freelance writer, editor, and content strategist who is passionate about elevating the standard of writing on the web. Erin previously helped build The Muse’s beloved daily publication and led the company’s branded content team. If you’re an individual or company looking for transportation paper help making your content better—or you just want to essays go out to tea—get in dissertion, touch at eringreenawald.com.

Hmmm, seems you#39;ve already signed up for documentation this class. As Applied Business Unit 3 Coursework? While you#39;re here, you may as well check out all the amazing companies that are hiring like crazy right now.

Free Information Technology essays. Context/Background - The central problem for the Internet users is essays, how to essay, obtain accurate information for a query in an efficient and fast way. And the most efficient way to solve the problem nowadays is using the search engine, which is documentation, a software system that could search information from the Internet automatically and provide query services for the users. Aims - The first purpose of the project is to implement a search engine, which includes a crawler, an inverted index, a graphical user interface, and a reporting facility. And the second purpose is to as applied business 3 coursework, test which ranking algorithm more satisfies the needs of users in the search engine of the documentation, project. Method - The crawler would collect webpages which would be analyzed and stored in the database. According to the information in the database, an inverted index would be built to restore all the information for and contrast essay two countries the efficiency of the search engine. And then the search engine could search the information for essays users in the inverted index. For the convenience of the users, a graphical user interface is used for users inputting queries and some ranking algorithms are used to satisfy users' needs more quickly.

And a reporting facility would help users know what the most users are searching. To test the search engine, the test case of the search engine in the project would be the webpages of 'Durham University'. When it comes to the second aim, several tests would be made to tale essay, compare the documentation, ranking algorithms to transportation problem research, find out the most suitable algorithm. Results ' The search engine would be evaluated using the unique general method which is based on documentation, the traditional famous evaluation method, and the method evaluates the search engine according to handmaid's prompts, the capability, indexing method, indexing results, and essays, user burden. Generally, the search engine is quite a good one from the value of the about, factors.

And the differences between PAGERANK and HITS algorithms are also analyzed that the response time of PAGERANK is less while the HITS is a query-dependence algorithm. So the user would decide the algorithm based on their queries. Conclusion ' In the essays, project, a search engine has been made and as a platform, the ranking algorithms PAGERANK and HITS have been compared to let the search engine get the better results. Finally, the factors of evaluation have been brought forward and evaluate the search engine. Keywords ' search engine, crawler, index, database, query, reporting facility, PAGERANK, HITS. With the rapidly development of the essays for ucf, Internet technology, more and more people would like to derive information from the Internet. Documentation Essays. There are four main characters of the information in essays for ucf, the web (Wei, 2005): hugeness, heterogeneity, dynamics, and essays, semi-structured. What is more, the information in the web contains quantities of dynamic hyperlinks. With the features of the as applied business unit 3 coursework, information in the web, the most useful tool to search the documentation, internet is search engine. In 1994, the about, earliest search engine 'World Wide Web Worm' indexed about 110 thousand webpages.

However, there have been 350 million documents in the Internet, and the number of documents still increased by 1 million per day (Yibing, 2011). Documentation Essays. According to the research by China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) in 2014, 'The 33rd Statistics Report for China Internet Developing Situation', by essays for ucf December in 2013, the number of documentation essays, Chinese webpages has been up to 150 billion, up 22.2 percent on last year's same period. However, the Chinese webpages are just the tip of the submerged iceberg. As a result, people could only use the search engines to access the information they want among such a large amount of information. The report also says that by December in 2013, the dissertion definition, number of search engine users in China has raised to essays, 490 million, up over 38 million on essays for ucf, last year's same period, and the increasing rate is 8.5 percent while the use rate of the essays, search engines has been to 79.3 percent. Therefore, how to search the useful and valuable information from such a plenty of information has been an important issue in the field of good ideas for a thesis paper, information retrieval and data mining. B. Search Engine.

In the background as shown above, the search engine has been developed and is very popular among the Internet users, and nowadays, the search engine has been one of the most effective tools when it comes to the information retrieval. A search engine is a software system which merges almost every aspect of advanced technology, such as analysis of user behavior, natural language processing, data mining, information retrieval, and robot learning. The search engine would provide query services for the users after it crawls, indexes and ranks the webpages (Shuling, 2011). The query services include webpages, pictures, videos, or other types of documents. It supplies an effective measure for users to search for information and navigation. Nowadays, the documentation essays, search engine seems to be an essential in the life of most people.

If the search engine does not exist, it would be hard for people to search the information they want in the Internet. It would be an awful thing and would lead the essays for ucf, internet useless because everyone gets a lot of information but few is actually they want. The basic function of a search engine is to documentation essays, navigate information based on the content of websites and problem research, webpages. Essays. It crawls all kinds of resources and information, analyzes them automatically, gets the paper, key words, and documentation essays, builds database using index. The users of a search engine inquire the database in the webpage, and the results would include all the webpages whose content match the query. What is more, the search results would be sorted according to the importance of webpage and matching algorithm of key words (Xuesong, 2008:3). According to 'Knowledge Management' which is transportation research paper, written by Jawadekar and Waman (2011), 'a search engine works as the following order: webpage crawling, indexing, and searching'.

First of all, automated web crawler which follows every link on the web site would retrieve and store information from the HTML markup of the webpages. And then the search engine would analyze the contents of webpages to determine which type of information (text, picture') is included, and how to essays, index them. All the information would be stored in the index database for the later queries. Business Unit 3 Coursework. Once the user inputs the documentation essays, query in the webpage of search engine, the index helps find information matching queries in essays for ucf, the database as soon as possible. At the same time, it returns a list of best-matching webpages which contain the title and parts of text according to its criteria.

However, nowadays, the search engine should work in a loop of crawling, indexing, and searching to update the information in the index. The data from the report of 'The 33rd Statistics Report for China Internet Developing Situation' shows that several most frequent Internet service are communication(86.2 percent), information retrieval(79.3 percent), entertainment(54.7 percent), and commercial trade(48.9 percent). The above data proves that the four Internet services have been the essential part of most people's lives. Documentation. And because of the essay prompts, specific feature of the search engine, it solves the problems of how to search the valuable and useful information for the users, which is the main reason why people are interested in it, and the search engine become the necessary tool in the people's daily life. C. Ranking Algorithm. In the early age of the search engine technology development, the users pay more attention to whether the searched results are relevant to the query. As a result, the information could only be classified as relevant or not when it comes to the keywords in documentation essays, the query. Therefore, the essays for ucf, searched results would combine as a disordered and Boolean relevant set of information. With the essays, development of the search engine technology, there appear the ranking algorithms based on the content of webpages.

The algorithm would weigh the webpages by the frequency and position of the keyword of the query in the webpages. Specifically, if a keyword appears more times, the relevance between the webpage and the query would be higher; and if the position of the keyword is more important, the essays for ucf, authority of the webpage is higher. Therefore, the rank of the webpage in the result set would be higher. Then, the ranking algorithms based on the hyperlinks analysis appear. The kind of algorithms takes the methodology of citation analysis in the traditional information index theory, which considers the hyperlinks as the quotation of the webpage, and if the times of a webpage is documentation essays, cited more, the authority value would be higher; and if a webpage is quoted by an authority webpage, the authority value of the webpage would be higher, and business unit, finally the rank of the webpage would be higher.

Nowadays, the famous search engines such as Google take the kind of essays, algorithms. However, the algorithm only considers the importance and authority of the webpage, but not the relevance between the transportation problem research, content of webpages and the queries. Therefore, the algorithms have been developed by adding the computation of the topic relevance and several other factors which might influence the ranking. Nowadays, the documentation, ranking algorithms would exert influence on good ideas for a, the evaluation of documentation essays, a search engine whether they could put the valuable and useful information at the first of the results list, which is the core problem of the search engines for the users. D. Purpose of Project. The first purpose of the project is to implement a search engine, which includes a web crawler which could get all the resources and information of the webpages, an index which could save data from the transportation problem research paper, crawler, a graphic user interface which is convenient for essays users to transportation research paper, input a query and return the result list to the users, and several ranking algorithms which rank the search results. The second purpose of the project is to compare the documentation, ranking algorithms PAGERANK and HITS to find their advantages and disadvantages and which ranking algorithm would be more suitable for essay the search engine in the project. Design a web crawler. Build and maintain an documentation essays index. Design a GUI (such that a user can pose queries).

Implement a basic ranking algorithm (which ranks the search results for a given query). Implement a well-known ranking algorithm such as PAGERANK. Improve the GUI by allowing more complicated user queries (e.g. using Boolean opereators). Implement a reporting facility that collects all searches perfomed by any user of the tool for dissertion statistical analysis. Design another well-known ranking algorithm such as HITS and compare it with PAGERANK. Implement a visual representation of the data collected by the reporting facility. A. Development of Search Engine. According to the criterion of ranking the results, the search engine could be classified as three generations (Lina et al., 2011). The first generation search engine ranks the results according to the relevance between the webpages and the queries. Documentation Essays. And the relevance is computed by weighing and scoring the keywords in good for a, the query.

The kind of search engines searches the documentation, results based on the content of the handmaid's tale prompts, webpages, generally, there are two methods. The first one classifies the webpages in the different indexes by using the essays, traditional library information management and the users could search the paper, results by essays searching the indexes. The most representative search engine is Yahoo and becomes the foundation of other websites of search engines. The second one is based on the match between the content of webpages and the queries. It considers whether the webpages contain the keywords and essays for ucf, the position and frequency of the keywords in a webpage to decide if the webpage is relevant with the query or not. The most representative and famous search engine is AltaVista, and the relevant technology is adopted by other search engines, and finally developed to be the basic algorithm of the search technology. However, the documentation essays, first generation search engines has the obvious drawbacks, the first method promises the relevance, but it is not automatic, as a result, it is not convenient for good for a the users to use the search engine. While the second one uses the keywords in documentation, the query, which could be cheated by the spam webpages.

To avoid the defects, the second generation search engines are developed. Actually, the second generation search engines scores the compare essay about, importance of the webpage by whether it is clicked by the users and how long the users would like to spend in the webpage or the number of the essays, in-hyperlinks in the webpage. Since 1996, the researchers have started to use the method of the hyperlinks which is originated by the method of citation analysis. The citation analysis method is to analyze the citation relationship among the literatures and mark and index the compare, literature by documentation quotation language. In the method, if one paper is cited by more paper, the paper would be more valuable and important. And if one paper is cited by more important paper, the paper itself would be more important. In the same way, there is and contrast two countries, similar 'citation' relationship which is called hyperlinks among the webpages. The signification of the hyperlink method is essays, not only just a novel ranking algorithm, but also the algorithm is automatic, as a result, the algorithm allows users to handmaid's tale prompts, search the big scale of the webpages, at the same time, the algorithm also considers the relevance of the results and the speed of searching. What is documentation essays, also worth noticing is that the algorithms based on the hyperlinks have lots of benefits.

However, it is thesis, not the only kind of ranking algorithms in the second generation search engines. Documentation Essays. There are still many other algorithms based on dissertion definition, the hyperlinks adding the analysis of the content of the essays, webpages and some other factors to rank the results. The third generation is the as applied unit 3 coursework, intelligent search engine, the main character of which is to satisfy the specific needs of the users. In fact, the second generation has been improved in the evaluation factor of precision and recall compared with the first generation and is still the mainstream in the Internet. Documentation Essays. However, the algorithms in the second generation have not considered the essays for ucf, query, which means that once the query includes many keywords which belong to different fields, the relevance of the results would not satisfy the users. The situation requires the users to have the search skill to documentation, get better results.

As a result, the search engines need to understand and guess the intention of the transportation paper, users so as to help the users filter the results. The intelligent search engines shown above are the third generation search engine. Nowadays, there are some search engines which are essentially different with the documentation essays, second search engines. For example, natural language search engine, clustering search engine, semantic search engine and so on. The kind of search engines is good ideas for a thesis paper, generically called the third generation search engine. B. Problem Domain. According to 'Search Engines Information Retrieval in Practice' (W.Bruce, 2010), there are three 'big issues' in the field of information retrieval in the 1960s, and documentation, the problems have not been solved nowadays. The major core problem is relevance, which is a basic conception of information retrieval.

If the index database compares a query with the information in the index simply and returns the exact match, the relevance of the results would not be good enough because different words could express the same meaning, and it is called 'vocabulary mismatch problem' in information retrieval (Furnas et al., 1987). Handmaid's Essay. As a result, it is necessary to distinguish the concepts of topical relevance and user relevance. The queries are in documentation essays, the same topic if a query and key words in the index are topical relevant. For example, weather and snow are topical relevant. When it comes to the user relevant, the results would be based on the history records of the user. To solve the problem of relevant, researchers bring forward many retrieval models, which are the fundament of ranking algorithm.

A search engine uses ranking algorithms to yield the result list. And a good ranking algorithm could find most of the compare, query relevant results. However, most of ranking algorithms are based on the static feature of the text rather than language structure, which means the ranking algorithms would consider more about the essays, number of words appearing than whether the word is a noun or adjective. Some advanced algorithms consider the language structure as the second factor of ranking the webpages while the most important is still appearing rate of words. The second core problem is evaluation problem.

In 1960s, Cyril Cleverdon made the evaluation method (Cyril, 1970). Unit. He used two evaluation factors'precision and recall which are even popular now. Precision is documentation essays, a factor which matches intuition and it is the ratio of relevant document of all the searched documents. Recall is the thesis, proportion of searched documents of the whole documents. And there is a hypothesis when recall is used: Given the query, all the documentation, relevant documents are available. It is obviously impossible for compare essay about two countries a large database. However, it would be useful when it comes to the smaller test collection. What is more, the clickthrough rate records the clicked documents during the process of search. It could be one of the evaluation factors because the essays, clickthrough rate with other log data is relevant with relevance.

But in the project, clickthrough cannot be tested to evaluate the search engine. However, the search engine company still uses relevance judgment as a supplement to determine the effectiveness of the results. The third core problem is handmaid's essay prompts, how to pay attention to the users and their needs. After all, the evaluation is user-centered, which means the users decide whether a search engine is documentation essays, good or not. However, keyword queries are often poor descriptions of actual information needs. For example, 'blue' might be a color or a feeling or a type of song. Therefore, lots of researches about problem paper, interaction between users and essays, the search engine have been done.

Finally, query refinement techniques such as query expansion, query suggestion, relevance feedback refine the query and improve the ranking results. This section describes the software requirements which include software I have selected and the reason why I selected them, and then it explains the good ideas for a thesis, architectural design of documentation, my search engine. A. Software Requirements. The search engine is developed using Eclipse running on a Windows 8 operating system. The comparison of several kinds of technique in prompts, platforms and application of platforms are shown respectively as Table 1 and Table 2 (Jing, 2010: 25). As the project might run in documentation essays, cross-platform, considering speed, cost, and expansionism, I choose the JSP to be my development technology. And Eclipse is convenient to debug and run the dissertion, java code, so I consider it as my programming software.

And I use Tomcat (a web application server developed by essays the same company of JSP) to configure the web environment and publish my search engine webpage. B. System Architecture. According to the basic procedure and the function of a simple search engine written above, I take the architecture shown as Figure 1, which is based on a similar figure that can be found in 'Development of Lucene + Nutch Search Engine' (Xuesong, 2008). Dissertion. It is composed by 5 main modules which are crawling of webpage information, analysis of documentation, webpage content, foundation of webpage index, sorting of webpage search result, and good ideas, tools and interfaces of webpage retrieval. The main modules could finish the whole webpage search engine with other information retrieval technology. Crawling of webpage information.

The software or system which collects the webpage information is called a web crawler. Generally, a web crawler uses the hyperlink in essays, the webpage to traversal of the whole Internet, which means the crawler could crawl from compare essay, one HTML document to another HTML document by URL references. Suppose the Internet is a super large graph whose node is the webpage and directed edge is the hyperlink in the webpage. And then we could use the method of graph traversal to access the Internet (Gang and Zhendong, 2010: 11-12). Generally, the Internet graph could be traversed by two methods which are breadth-first traversal and depth-first traversal respectively. However, if the the depth-first traversal is used, the crawler might fall in the much 'depth' of the essays, graph (most of them would be spam or useless information) or go into the 'black hole' (The black hole is the hyperlink of the page points to itself, or the different URLs point to the same webpage) of the Internet so that it could not get out to search other webpages. Two Countries. While we could not use the complete breadth-first traversal because the results would be affected by initial URL the user chooses to a large extent. As a result, two methods described above are not suitable in the project. Essays. Luckily, there is a third method to traverse the Internet which is called the preferential crawler (Bing, 2009: 201). The preferential crawler would allocate each webpage a value of importance at the first place.

And then the method would be the 3 coursework, same with breadth-first traversal except that the initial webpage would be the most important webpage, and the next webpage would be the second most important webpage, and so on. Now, the problem is how much each webpage values. Actually, there are many factors affecting the documentation, importance of a webpage, such as popularity of hyperlink, the importance of the hyperlink, average depth of hyperlink, quality of the website, and the weight of history etc. The popularity of hyperlink depends on the number and quality of backlinks which link to the current URL. Problem Paper. And we define it as IB(P). Documentation Essays. The importance of hyperlink is a function of string of URL.

For example, the URL with '.com' or 'home' would be more important than those with '.cc' or 'map'. And we call it as IL(P). Then, we could define the importance of webpage I(P) as following (Gang and Zhendong, 2010:22): In the function, a and b are the parameters which adjust the proportion of compare essay, IB(P) and IL(P). And the average depth of link would be guaranteed by the breadth-first algorithm. Analysis of webpage content. Generally, the webpages or the documents which are crawled by the web crawler would be analyzed at the first place for building the index later.

The analysis should filter the format information and advertisement in the webpage to get the effective document content. Therefore, there are two tasks in the analysis process of documentation, webpage content: analyzing the basic information of webpage and compare two countries, recognizing the structure of webpage content. Documentation. The aim of the tasks is the same to extract effective data from the webpages and filter the spam in the Internet. Furthermore, the duplicated webpage should be deleted during analysis to tale essay prompts, avoid the documentation, same results appearing at the same time. In the problem research, index and the query of the search engine, the unit is the basic morpheme item which could be got after analyzing the webpages or documents. And the analysis of documents usually includes extracting words, eliminating punctuation mark, convert between uppercase and lowercase letters, resuming word stem, eliminating conjunction and high frequency words. What is more, the webpages are usually composed of HTML and JavaScript, containing large quantities of format information and accessories.

The most important thing for essays analysis of webpage is to separate the text information with the business unit 3 coursework, format information to provide materials for documentation essays indexing and ranking. Besides, some important items in the webpage should also be noticed during the analysis. For example, all the titles, link words, blackletter type, etc. The information would be marked during the analysis for higher the weight in the process of indexing and ranking. It would be difficult and time-consuming to finish all the items written above by checking the webpages character by character. As Applied Unit 3 Coursework. In the project, I use the 'regular expression' to finish the process of analysis. The 'regular expression' could extract the valid information from webpages by matching texts with the 'regular expression pattern'. The module of the documentation, analysis part is shown as figure 2 (Xuesong, 2008:46). Natural Language Process.

Actually, the 'regular expression' just eliminates the spam in the webpages but not extract the essays for ucf, important information. For example, in each book, the words like 'a', 'of' cannot be avoided, however, in most circumstances, these words are not the focus of the search engine users. As a result, these words could be neglected and not listed in the key words. Documentation. The natural language process should also be used in the query of users. If the user inputs a sentence as a query, the search engine would give worse results compared that break the sentence down to several key words when the natural language process is transportation problem paper, not used. Essays. So, it is very important to let the search engine understand the natural language. The first thing I dealt with is to set a list of stop words like 'of' and 'the'. These words are neither the dissertion, focus of the users, nor cannot provide any information. The common of these words is documentation essays, that they appear very frequently so that if consider them as key words, much memory would be wasted and more useless results would appear. The second I have done is to neglect the tense of the verbs and the plural of the nouns.

It could be done by extracting the dissertion definition, 'stem' of the words so that the tense, the plural or other forms converting would be ignored. For example, the stem word of essays, 'universal', 'universe', 'university', and 'universities' is handmaid's prompts, 'univers'. As a result, conversion of most words could be found and would not affect the match between the queries and the key words in the index. Foundation of webpage index. The webpages have to essays, be indexed for the later use. And a better designed index could increase searching speed and locate the webpage more preciously so as to decrease the cost. The function of index is to analyze the compare and contrast about, search information, extract key words from the documents, and build the index table of documents. There are many index models in the field of search engine, such as inverted document index, vector space model, probability model and so on. And it is very important because the structure and effectiveness are the keys of web information index system. As a result, it is required to be easy to implement, maintain, retrieval information quickly, and need little space.

Nowadays, most search engines use the inverted index to be the documentation, index model (Manish, 2011) because the structure is proper to response the key words retrieval quickly. Its structure considers the key words as index key words and access entrance of linked list. And the inverted index could determine the and contrast, list of documentation essays, document directly through index keywords. To get the performance of the good, search engine better, the inverted index is usually stored in the memory. Essays. And to reduce the pressure of the memory, the document is represented by dissertion definition a unique document code while all the documents and documentation, their codes would be stored in the database. The basic structure of inverted index is showed below as figure 3 (Xuesong, 2008: 67). In the figure 3, the key words are the results of 'analysis of webpage content', and handmaid's prompts, the documents in the inverted index are actually the code of documents. Each item in the structure of inverted index is an index item with relevant information generated by the key words.

The advantage of inverted index is that it changes the organization of information to be convenient to documentation essays, retrieval information while other models have to search every document to find out whether the key words are included or not. Sort of results. There are a lot of webpages (web spams) which include most keywords but only the keywords. Transportation Research. Absolutely, they are not the users' needs. Documentation. To avoid the spams filling in the list of results and let the users find what they want as soon as possible, it is very important to sort the results. During the sorting process, the importance of the webpage itself would take effect.

And PAGERANK and HITS algorithms could calculate the importance of webpages based on business 3 coursework, the structure of the Web (Gang, 2011: 80). A famous and popular way to sort the results is the PAGERANK algorithm. The results yielded by the search engine are generally sorted by the importance of the webpage itself which could be measured by documentation essays the connection among webpages. The PAGERANK method suppose the Internet as a democracy environment, we could measure the importance of webpage by the link structure. For example, when webpage A has a link to webpage B, the weight of webpage B would increase (Xuesong, 2008:235).

There are two hypothesizes in the PAGERANK algorithm (Junlin, 2012: 138). One of them is that if a page is linked many times, the webpage is very important. If a webpage is linked by another important webpage, the essays for ucf, webpage is also important. In a word, the importance could be passed among webpages. The other hypothesis is documentation, that users access webpage randomly, browse the webpage with the hyperlinks, and never go back to browse the previous webpage. As a result, the next webpage is more important than the previous one.

However, there is a serious problem in PAGERANK that the PAGERANK is not query dependent so that each webpage would have the same value of PAGERANK for all queries. What is and contrast two countries, more, spam pages could link to essays, one webpage to promote the importance of the page. Besides, the third problem in PAGERANK that only uses in-links to a page and never uses out-links. To figure out the problems, we could use the HITS algorithm which defines the problem research paper, authority that many other pages point to the webpage and the hug that the page has outgoing links to many other pages. The basic idea is similar to PAGERANK that dig the useful information by documentation links in compare and contrast essay about, the Internet. And HITS algorithm considers authority and hug respectively that it evaluates hug based on documentation essays, the evaluation of authority. Finally, a weight would be assigned to the webpage. The authority is unit 3 coursework, relevant with the quality of content information so as to attract many webpages to link while the hug is relevant with the quality of hyperlink page which is provided by the webpage. The higher authority webpages a webpage links, the higher its hug would be (Christopher, 2008). And the input of the HITS algorithm is known query relevant webpages, as a result, HITS algorithm usually supplies the documentation, webpages which are relevant to the query which is unlike the PAGERANK algorithm.

It means that the number of webpages 'HITS' searched would be more than that of ideas for a paper, 'PAGERANK'. However, there are some disadvantages in the HITS algorithm. The first of all is essays, that it is a query relevant algorithm which means it could not start calculating until the and contrast essay about, users input the query. The second problem is that tightly-knit community effect could happen, which means if the query-relevant webpages link to other webpages which are not relevant and link to each other, the HITS algorithm would give them a high rank so that users might not get the query relevant information. The third is that the structure is not stable, which means if one webpage is deleted or the few links change, the sorting according to the HITS algorithm would be great changed (Junlin, 2012: 144). Graphical User Interface. In the section of documentation essays, graphical user interface (GUI), based on the famous search engine company Google, the unit, home page would be very simple and convenient for users to search the information that he/she wants to. And my home page would be much more simply because the search engine could only search the webpage and text. The current home page is shown as figure 4: The users could input the words or the sentence they want to search in the left text box while they could type the number of results per page (n) they want in the right text box. And a brief introduction has been given for the users to use the search engine more easily.

The next webpage would show the documentation essays, previous n results of all the results. And at the same time the page would tell the user how many results in total, the titles of searched webpages, the contents which include the words that the user searches, the websites of searched webpages, the time when the webpage is crawled which is helpful for the update of the database of the problem, whole search engine, and essays, which page current webpage is. Users could also click the button to tale prompts, select the first page, the previous page, the next page and the last page. What is more, users could decide which method to rank the results (HITS or PAGERANK). Suppose a user wants to search the 'robot' information and let the search engine return 3 results per page. Essays. They input the word 'robot' in the lefe and '3' in the right, and then press the transportation research, button 'search'. The next page would be as figure 5: We could find out from the picture above that there are six results in total and documentation, it shows the first five webpages that include the word 'robot', which is highlighted in the current page. And at the top of the page, users could choose using the 'PAGERANK' or 'HITS' to good paper, rank the pages. At the bottom of the page, users could see other results in the next page by essays clicking 'Next'.

The pattern of problem paper, next page is almost the same as the one above. And when users click 'PAGERANK' or 'HITS', the different results and ranking methods would be shown. What is worth noticing is the essential difference between 'PAGERANK' and 'HITS'. In the instruction of the report, three core problems have been brought forward. And a part of the first problem and the third problem could be solved by 'analysis of webpage content' and 'natural language process'.

And the main aim of the reporting facility is to provide the documentation essays, information of 'user-relevant' so as to solve the other part of the first problem. The reporting facility is responsible to record every query the user has done. When the new query is input, the search engine would find the similar information of the 3 coursework, old queries, and the results would have the characteristic of the user. The other aim of reporting facility is to let the user know what other users are searching. When the user inputs the query, the query would be stored in the database. And at the same time, the old queries could be loaded from the essays, database to compare the new query to handmaid's tale essay, find the similar information. The database would store the key words, the essays, times that the dissertion definition, key words has been searched, and the last time when the key word is searched. What is more, if any user wants to see what he/she has searched before, the queries could have been visualized in the graphical user interface. According to the deliveries and typical criterion of essays, search engine, some experiments have been done to evaluate the search engine I have made.

And the test case would be the webpages of 'Durham University' which means that the webpages the crawler crawls start with 'www.dur.ac.uk'. The criterion and the results of the experiments would be shown. Finally, the solutions to the problems in the part of business 3 coursework, 'problem domain' and the benefits and deflects of the search engine would be demonstrated. Criterion of Evaluating the Search Engine. In 1973, Lancaster and Fayen listed 6 factors to evaluate the search engines, coverage, recall ratio, precision ratio, response time, user effort, and format output (Lancaster and Fayen, 1973). Although the index has been brought forward over 40 years ago, and the target is the traditional online information retrieval system. However, in terms of the essence of information retrieval system, the evaluation factors are still useful even nowadays. Later, after Heting Chu and Marilyn Rosenthal analyze and essays, compare three famous search engines (Alta Vista, Excite, and Lycos), they come up with five aspects to tale essay, evaluate the search engines, respectively indexing, search power, search effect, output, and users' burden (Chu and Rosenthal, 1996). With the development of the research, the user experience is paid more and more attention.

Belkin considers the essential issue in the information retrieval system is anomalous state of knowledge (ASK) (Belkin, 1993), which is an important part of the information retrieval model. Bell considers the complexity of the web based on the former research, and focus on documentation, the user experience when evaluating the search engine (Bell, 1998). Considering the standard criterion above and the concrete condition of the current mainstream search engines, I think the following criterion is reasonable to evaluate the search engine in general. Capability of the Search Engine. The factor includes the capacity and coverage of the database of the search engine, the content and the depth of indexing, and the novel rate of the database. The first one would affect the as applied unit 3 coursework, 'recall' factor directly according to the statistics, which shows that the more webpages the database has, the more results might be searched. Usually, the index database is composed of URL, name of document, content, titles, sub-titles and so on. The content of the combination would affect the precision of the search engines directly. In the meanwhile, the organization of the webpages is a multilayered hypertext structure, and the depth of indexing means which layer the search engines index. For example, some search engines only index the essays, home page (the first layer) while some others index deeper layer. The other meaning of the depth is whether the search index all the webpage or just some content.

For example, some search engines only index the name or the title of the HTML document while others index the whole content of the webpages. Generally, the more content a search engine indexes, the better the indexing effect is and and contrast, the more resources would be occupied. The novel rate includes two aspects, uniqueness and update frequency. Uniqueness of a search engine is the ratio of the unique results which other search engines do not contain in all the results the search engine returns. Essays. And nowadays, the update frequency is problem paper, very important because the information in the web varies largely in a second and is unpredictable. As a result, the search engine has to promise the ''' of the documentation, information and avoid the 'dead hyperlinks'. When it comes to my search engine, the test case is the webpages of 'Durham University', the capacity of the database is limited. However, the content and the depth of indexing would be very comprehensive, which means that the database would save all the contents of each webpage.

But, the database would never be updated because it is not an good for a thesis paper on-line version now. The aim of the documentation, test is to evaluate the performance but not the capability. The factor includes construction of indexing expression and the indexing function. In 1998, Rousseau et al. found that one of the difficulties is how to bring forward keywords and compare, use the different command indicators when using the essays, on-line library (Fang and Salvendy, 2000). In fact, the search engine has the same problem with the on-line library. Definition. And for the most search engines, the queries the documentation essays, users input are the most important factor for the results. However, the queries would be different even if when the different users search the same target. To solve the problem, some search engines (such as AskJeeves) would provide some other relevant keywords to give the users more choices to get more and essays for ucf, better results. And some user-friendly search engine supply the toolbar and dropdown menu to documentation, help the users come up with more detailed query so as to transportation problem research paper, get more satisfied results. The number and effects of indexing functions provided by the search engines would affect the indexing results seriously.

And many indexing technologies used in the traditional on-line indexing system are developed to be the important technologies in the search engine field, such as Boolean index, truncation index, position index, and limited index. In the documentation essays, meanwhile, the graphic user interface has been separated as the normal index interface and advanced index interface according to the needs of the users. And almost all the search engines do not differentiate the essays for ucf, lowercase and uppercase of the documentation essays, words and consider the list of tale essay prompts, stop words. In my search engine, I take the simpleness as the most important factor in the graphic user interface. As a result, there is no toolbar and dropdown menu existing. However, it has its own stop words list and do not differentiate the lowercase and uppercase of the essays, words. Furthermore, it supports the Boolean query to help users get more satisfied results. This factor is very important to essay, evaluate the search engine I have made because the search engine could be quantized to compare with other search engines. The search engine has to deal with more information, which is the significant different from on-line indexing system. If the indexing algorithms were not improved, it would take lots of documentation, time to deal with a simple search. And most of the users would not wait for transportation problem paper the search engine when they use it to essays, search the information.

There are no standard test cases to handmaid's, test the average response time of the search engines. And it is documentation, not fair to compare my search engine with the famous search engine like Google because the scale of the database is not comparative. As a result, I would give some words randomly and tale essay prompts, give a simple list of response time of the documentation, words. The experiments have been tested when the number of webpages is 998 and the number of the keywords is 185451. The detail information would be listed as table 1. From the table 1, we could see that the process of searching would take too much time for the user.

There are two main reasons slowing down the speed of the ideas for a, search engine. The first one is that the graphic user interface requires the part of content which include the keywords returns. If we just revise it to return just the title or just one sentence, the time would be reduced to less than 1 second. The second one affecting time is the query in the database. For supporting the fuzzy query, the query 'like' has to be used, however, it takes too much time. If the fuzzy query is not a necessary, the time accessing the database would decrease significantly.

Recall and Precision. These two factors are very important in the past when the information is limited. However, nowadays, the users pay more attention to whether the hyperlinks of the documentation essays, information they want appear in the first several pages. The following table shows the relationship between the retrieved webpages and relevance (C.J., 2010). The calculation of recall and precision is as follows:

In the function, |.| means the number of '.'. As the equation shows, the measure of as applied business unit 3 coursework, these two factors in the search engine would not be easy, especially for the recall because it is even harder to get the number of 'A'. What is more, in my search engine, we could suggest that in the PAGERANK method, there is no non-relevant retrieved webpage existing because the Boolean match has been used. In a word, the value of these factors would be very high in my search engine but it is useless to compare with other search engines by these two factors. The format and content of output. The outputs of the results are different among search engines, however, there are almost three parts: title, summary, and URL in all the search engines, what is essays, more, the keywords are highlighted in some search engines. What is more, some search engines add introduction, type, webpage size, date, hyperlinks to detail the essays for ucf, results. Furthermore, the search engine would show that how long it would take and how many results it returns. Documentation. If the number of the results would be large, the compare and contrast, keyword is not useful for searching while the number is small demonstrates that the keyword is documentation, too special. In the graphic user interface of my search engine, it would return all the as applied business 3 coursework, basic parts above and the keywords are highlighted. What is more, it would return time and the number of results.

In the part, three more functions are included, post-processing, assistance process, and information filter. The post-processing allows the users to essays, type more keywords to search the information in the former results. During the process of assistance, search engines usually provide the preview function or cached snapshot function. The information filtering include two aspects, one is that the search engine would filter some unhealthy information for the immaturity while the other aspect is to return different results to different users according to the users' history records. In my search engine, there are no functions such as 'search in the result', preview, and information filtering. However, the reporting facility would save the users' queries so as to analyze it later. Comparison between the PAGERANK and HITS. According to the principle of the PAGERANK and HITS algorithm, it seems that they are similar which are based on the hyperlinks and tale, use the eigenvector. However, the essays, differences between the algorithms are obvious according to the principles and experiments. The first one is that HITS algorithm is query-dependent because the authority of the HITS is the weight of the indexing theme. However, PAGERANK is a query-independent algorithm because it is independent with the indexing theme.

The PAGERANK algorithm is research, based on the 'reference analysis', addition with the quality of the Internet. It not only considers the documentation essays, number of the in-linked webpages, but also regards the importance of the transportation problem research, in-linked webpages. The second one is that HITS algorithm gets the initial processing data based on documentation, the text search engine, and the importance of the webpages passes from the hub page to the authority page. As Applied Business. What is more, in the HITS algorithm, the hub and the authority improve each other. While the PAGERANK algorithm is documentation essays, based on the random surfer model, which means that the as applied business 3 coursework, importance of the documentation essays, webpages transfers among the authority webpages. The third one is that the response time of the good ideas for a thesis paper, HITS algorithm is essays, more than that of the PAGERANK algorithm. Although the HITS algorithm analyzes the fewer webpages, however, it has to extract the initial results set from the search engine and expand to the basic results set, which would take lots of handmaid's tale prompts, time. Documentation. While superficially the PAGERANK algorithm deals with more webpages, but the processing runs in advance, as a result, the response time seems less. This section contains evaluations on the work carried out tale, during the course. The first sub-section focuses on evaluating the documentation essays, solutions selected and the second sub-section assesses the implementation and evaluation of the resulting systems. Evaluation of Solutions.

The final aim of the project is to build a search engine and compare the as applied, ranking algorithm PAGERANK and HITS. To realize the aim, the deliverables have been shown in the introduction part. The following part is to documentation essays, evaluate each part in the deliverables. The first one in the minimum objectives is to design a web crawler. The detail has been introduced and it actually works. However, there are some problems in the crawler part.

The biggest problem is that the crawler crawls the webpages so fast that sometimes it would be misunderstood as a malware. For example, when the crawler crawls the test case which is exactly the webpage in the Durham University, the firewall of the university is always triggered and stop the crawler continue crawling. The second problem is that the crawler part takes too much time because it has to run on line. Each time the crawler saves a document, it would save the hyperlinks in the document in a array. However, not all the hyperlinks could be connected, as a result, the transportation problem paper, code has to get the HTTP code from the Internet, which would take time.

Only when the documentation essays, HTTP code is 200, the hyperlink could be connected, otherwise, the hyperlink could not be access. Another time-consuming part is to remove the duplicated URLs from the transportation paper, array when the scale of array is large. As a result, it is very easy to solve the documentation, problem actually. As long as let the crawler wait for 1 or 2 seconds, the firewall would not be triggered, however, the crawler part would take more time because of the tale, second problem. The second in the minimum objectives is to essays, build and maintain an handmaid's tale prompts index. Here I choose the inverted index as the index model because it has been widely used in many famous search engines, even the documentation, biggest open source search engine Lucene has been using the inverted index. And the benefits of the inverted index are obvious and have been introduced in the solution part. The third in transportation problem, the minimum objectives and the second in the intermediate objectives is to design a graphic user interface.

The principle of the GUI part is simple and convenient to use, which just include two input boxes which user could input the query and the number of results per documentation essays, page respectively, a very simple instruction guiding users to use the search engine, and transportation problem research, several keys for users to choose the ranking algorithm they like. If I have more time, there are lots of things to do. For example, the essays, function of 'search in the results' and cached snapshoot could be added to satisfy the users. The Boolean operators like '+','-' ,'|' could be used in the query to get more accurate information the user wants. More Boolean operators could be added if the more time is given. The last one in the minimum objectives, the third one in essays for ucf, the intermediate objectives and essays, the first one in dissertion definition, the advanced objectives are to essays, implement ranking algorithms, and the basic ranking algorithm I choose is a simple one, the Boolean model added fuzzy search to return the relevant webpages. The method promises that the returned results are definitely relevant to business 3 coursework, the query, which means that the precision of the essays, search engine would be 100 percent. However, some other models have not been tested and cannot be compared each other. The PAGERANK algorithm and HITS algorithm I implement is the handmaid's, most original one, which could compare and analyze the results more easily.

However, the effect of the original algorithms might not be good so that it would definitely affect the evaluation of the search engine. The last one in the intermediate objectives and the last one in the advanced objectives are to build and visualize a reporting facility which stores the users' query for statistical analysis. The part works but it is not a former work of providing the users their unique results even if they search the documentation, same word. In the end, although all the given objectives were completed, the improvements could still be done to essays for ucf, make the search engine better and to make the test data more convinced. Evaluation of documentation, Implementation. According to the 'Results' part, the search engine has been evaluated. However, there are still some problems need to be solved. First of all, the test case is business, not good. And because of the dynamics of the Internet, many webpages could not be accessed after it has been crawled.

Furthermore, the disadvantage of the crawler leads to the limited scale of the test case. As a result, it seems that the capability of the search engine is not good. But it is not true, if more time could be given, the detail in the crawling algorithm would be improved and the scale of the test case would be larger, the speed would rise significantly. The second worth noticing is that the indexing method, the Boolean query could work and the quality of the documentation essays, returned results is high. However, the toolbar and dropdown menu would be added if I have more time. In the third part, we could see that the response time is a little intolerable, the transportation problem research paper, reasons of which have been analyzed and the quantities of experiments could prove that reading and analyzing the sentence which include the key words from raw file which downloads from the documentation, webpages directly take too much time. If just one sentence or just title is returned, the time would be reduced significantly. And it seems that the recall and precision are not good factors to transportation problem research paper, evaluate my search engine. Essays. However, there are no more famous factors to evaluate the research, search engine as the problem domain in documentation, the 'Related Work' says.

The format and content in my search engine keep the same form with other famous search engines such as Google. The last part of evaluation in my search engine could not be measured because it is more like a expansion and future work of the project. In a word, the experiments could prove that the search engine could work and be able to compare the PAGERANK and HITS algorithms clearly, which realize the basic purpose of the project. But there are lots of details that could be improved. The purpose of the project is to paper, build a search engine and compare the PAGERANK and HITS ranking algorithms. The work has been separated to several sub-modules and each part has been done as deliverables, crawler, index, and graphic user interface. During the process of building the search engine, some key techniques have been breakthrough and documentation, three key problems have been tried to be solved. The crawler takes the preferential traversal to access the whole Internet. The benefit is that it not only avoids the black hole in the Internet, but also allows the most important webpages to be crawled at first.

And then the documents the crawler has crawled have to be dealt with for the indexing using. The content of the webpages always contains the useless format information and advertisements. As a result, the keywords in the content have to be extracted and business unit, the spam in the Internet is also filtered. The aim of the part includes extracting words, eliminating punctuation mark, convert between uppercase and lowercase letters, resuming word stem, eliminating conjunction and high frequency words. What is more, the dictionary of stop words is documentation essays, built to extract the useful key words from the content and the stems of the words are used to neglect the tense of the and contrast about, verbs and essays, the plural of the nouns. In the index part, the inverted index is used rather than the normal index which would increase the searching speed significantly. Transportation Research. And the ranking algorithms I have implemented include the basic Boolean algorithm, PAGERANK algorithm, and HITS algorithm. The graphic user interface is documentation essays, designed to be simple and convenient to be used by the users.

And the reporting facility saves all the queries of the users for the statistics use and would finally be used in the future. In the essay two countries, problem domain in the part of documentation, 'Related Work', three issues have been brought forward. The first one is how to define relevance, in my search engine, the techniques of the Boolean match, stems of the words, and natural language processing are used to solve the problem effectively. The second issue is how to evaluate the search engine. In the part of essay, 'Results', the whole system of evaluation has been given, although it is not appropriate for evaluating my search engine, however, it is quite a good system for evaluating the common search engine because it covers almost every aspect of the search engine. The last issue is how to satisfy the users. In my search engine, the former work has been done by the reporting facility. However, the problem has not been solved in the project.

But it is definitely the focus of the future work. Luo Gang and Wang Zhendong , (2010). Writing a web crawler by yourself, 1st Ed., Tsinghua Univeristy Press. Wang Xuesong, (2008). Development of Lecene+Nutch Search Engine, 1st Ed, Post Telecom Press. Yu Jing, (2010). Essays. Course of JavaWeb Application Development, 1st Ed, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Press.

W.Bruce Croft, Donald Metzler, and Trevor Strohman, (2010). Search Engines Information Retrieval in Practice, 1st Ed, China Machine Press. Jawadekar, Waman, (2011). Knowledge Management: Text Cases, Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Manish Patil, Sharma V. Thankachan, Rahul Shah, Wing-Kai Hon, Jeffrey Scott Vitter and Sabrina Chandrasekaran, (2011). And Contrast About Two Countries. Inverted Indexes for Phrases and Strings.

Available at: wkhon/papers/PTSHVC11.pdf (Accessed: 25 January, 2014) Furnas, G., et al.,(1987). 'The Vocabulary Problem in essays, Human-System Communication', Communications of the essays for ucf, ACM, November 1987,30(11), pp. 964-971. Cyril Cleverdon, (1970) 'Evaluation Tests of Information Retrieval Systems', Journal of Documentation, Vol. 26 Iss:1, pp. 55-67. Bing Liu, (2009).

Web Data Mining, 1st Ed, Tsinghua Univeristy Press. Luo Gang, (2011). Encoding Technology in the Search Engine ' Lucene Java, 1st Ed, Publishing House of Electronics Industry. Junlin Zhang, (2012). This is the Search Engine, 2nd Ed, Publishing House of Electronics Industry. Christopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan and Hinrich Sch??tze,(2008). Introduction to documentation essays, Information Retrieval.

Cambridge University Press. Wei Zhang (2005), 'Search Engine Optimization Strategy Research based on PageRank Algorithm', unpublished. Yibing Li (2011), 'Webpage Ranking Algorithm Study based on Search Engine', umpublished. China Internet Network Information Center(CNNIC)(2013). The 33rd Statistics Report for China Internet Developing Situation. Available at: http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201403/t20140305_46240.htm (Accessed: 24 April 2014) Shuling Dong (2011), 'Research and Improvement of Ranking Algorithms on Search Engine', umpublished. Lina Zhang, Zhiyin Yang, Bo Yang (2011), 'Research on the Current Development Situation on the Third-Generation Search Engine', Sci-Tech Information Development Economy, 21(34):141-143.

Lancaster, F. W. Paper. Fayen, E. G. (1973). Information Retrieval On-Line. Los Angeles: Melville Pub. Co. Heting Chu and Marilyn Rosenthal.,(1996). 'Search Engines for the World Wide Web: A Comparative Study and Evaluation Methodology', in Proc.

Of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, pp.127-135. Belkin, IV.j.,(1993). 'Interaction with texts: information retrieval as information-seeking behavior, Information Retrieval '93'55-66. Bell, S. 'Guidelines for the development of methodologies to evaluate Internet search engines:' Please do a couple of searches and send the feedback to me''. Glasgow: Department of Information Science, University of Strathelyde (MSeThesis), 1998. X. Fang and documentation, G. Salvendy(2000). 'Keyword comparison: a user-centered feature for improving web search tools', Int.J.Human-Computer Studies, Vol.52:915-931. C.J. Handmaid's Tale Essay Prompts. van RIJSBERGEN(2010). Information Retrieval.

Available at: http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Keith/pdf/Chapter7.pdf (Accessed: 28 April 2014) If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Information Technology essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of documentation, expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and essays for ucf, you could have your customised Information Technology work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

This Information Technology essay was submitted to us by a student in order to documentation essays, help you with your studies. This page has approximately words. If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows: Essay UK, Search Engines . Available from: http://www.essay.uk.com/free-essays/information-technology/search-engine.php [05-10-17]. If you are the essay prompts, original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Essay UK offers professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service. Documentation Essays. Our work is high quality, plagiarism-free and delivered on time. Essay UK is a trading name of Student Academic Services Limited , a company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 08866484 . Registered Data Controller No: ZA245894.